Editorial policy

Useful first. Clear about uncertainty.

Our standards for writing, sources, corrections, and responsible cultural interpretation.

Original work

We write for people who want to understand a topic, not for a target word count. Articles should add explanation, examples, comparison, or a useful structure beyond what a source already says. When a page compares Western zodiac signs, the Chinese zodiac, and Zi Wei Dou Shu, it identifies which tradition a statement belongs to and does not flatten different systems into one claim.

Sources and attribution

Historical claims, technical calculations, and quoted material are checked against reliable sources. We link to public references where possible and do not republish books, feeds, or another site’s articles as our own.

AI assistance

AI may assist with brainstorming, code, or translation checks. Every published page has human ownership: an editor verifies the claims, improves the prose, and removes generic or unsupported statements.

Corrections

If we find an error, we correct the page and add an update note when the change affects the meaning. Send a correction with the page URL and a source through our contact page.

Safety boundary

We do not publish content that presents symbolic traditions as medical, legal, financial, or guaranteed predictive advice. We avoid fear-based claims about death, disaster, illness, or inevitable relationship outcomes.